 For Daily Job Alert |
Join Our Whats App Channel |
| For Free Study Material |
Join Our Telegram Channel |
Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips
Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips is one of the Important Topic .Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips This topic is asked to evaluate the decision making capability of candidate .Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips
Such type of questions consist of a Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips followed by certain arguments in favour of or against the Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips. Candidates would be required to distinguish between the strong and weak Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips
Strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question.
Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question .
To answer this question, first of all we should determine whether an argument is strong or weak. For this, each argument should be subjected to the following tests –
1 ) If an argument is ambiguous, it is a weak argument.
2) If an argument is too simple, it is a weak argument.
3 )If an argument simply supports or denies a given statement without giving a proper analysis, it is a weak argument.
4) Arguments which consists of a question thrown back without any substance and argument is a weak argument.
5) If it is a scientifically established or universally acknowledge fact, it is a strong argument.
6) A argument that promotes or prohibits on the basis of an example is a weak argument.
Examples: Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips
Statement: Should India encourage exports, when most things are insufficient for internal use itself?
Arguments:
1 ) Yes. We have to earn foreign exchange to pay for our imports.
2 ) No. Even selective encouragement would lead to shortages.
Solution :- Clearly, India can export only the surplus and that which can be saved after fulfilling its own needs, to pay for its imports. Encouragement to export cannot lead to shortages as it shall provide the resources for imports. So, only argument I holds
Examples: Statement and Argument Shortcut Tricks & Tips
Statement : Should higher education be completely stopped for some time ?
Arguments :
I, No, It will hamper the coutry’s future progress.
II. Yes, It will reduce the educated unemployement
Solution :- I is an established fact that higher education promots country’s development. So I holds.II is weak
because higher education is not the cause of unemployment.
Problems Set for Statement & Argument
In each question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered 1 & 2. On the basis of information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the following suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Give your answer as-
1)If only 1 follows
2)If only 2 follows
3)If either 1 or 2 follows
4)If neither 1 nor 2 follows
5)If both 1 & 2 follow
- The government has decided to earmark a separate lane in the metropolis for passengers vehicles with more than one occupant.
Many people may resort to pool car systems to avoid traffic.
II.The move may help decongest the roads of the metropolis
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 5)If both 1 & 2 follow
Explanation :
The gov has taken steps assuming that decongestion of the roads will improve.
- New Census data on the educational status of India show the biggest increase in the no of people pursuing engineering & technology diplomas or technical degrees equivalent to a graduate .
India has over 30lakh people with teaching degree and over 15 lakh people with a medical degree
II.Education in India has been boosted up with the opening of new private and government colleges.
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
The biggest increase in the no of Engineering graduates is owing to the opening of new colleges
- NTPC is under a lot of pressure to expand and deliver cheap power but faces a big challenges as its customers, the state owned power distribution companies are not buying electricity due to their poor financial health.
NTPC should enter into distribution business and show existing discoms that power distribution is a profitable business
II.Debt-laden discoms have been forcing generating companies to run their units at less than full capacity.
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
When there is less demand, generating companies will be forced to produce less.
- The Indian Railways has tied up with TCS to pilot Systems to conduct its recruitments exam online, as the country’s largest employer looks to introduce trasparecy into its operation.
Online examination will reduce corruption and bring transparency
II.Cheating in examination will be wiped out
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 1 follow
Explanation :
Online examination will avoid forgery and reveal the real talents and accuracy of the candidates
- The Gov may raise the minimum wages in the country by as much as 25% and also make them binding on all states, a move aimed at improving the lifestyle of the poor and giving an indirect boost to the rural economy.
Unskilled workers will get motivated to move into semi-skilled and skilled category for a better lifestyle
II.It will help the gov to cut expenditure on social sector programmes and generate demands in the economy.
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
The increase in the min wages by the gov will help to provide livelihood to the workers and save the money spent on social programmes.
- The crime branch unearthed a major fake admission racket in Delhi University and arrested around 100 candidates for forged documents.
DU should cancel the admission of such candidates and strict action should be taken by the college against such candidates.
II.Document verification should be done properly to avoid the forgery.
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 1)If only 1 follow
Explanation :
DU should take the action against candidate to avoid this in future
- With the implementation of Mobile Number Portability(MNP), mobile subscribers can now keep their existing mobile numbers even while shifting between states and circles.
The profit of the mobile companies will reduce
II.People won’t to change their numbers frequently
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
With MNP facility customers can retain their number in any parts of India.
- Persistness weakness in global demand and the lower value of oil products led India’s merchandise exports to fall for the sixth straight month in May .
There will be an increase in the domestic demand of gold and jewellery
II.There will be an increase in the collection of indirect taxes in the month of April and May
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 1 follow
Explanation :
Decline in Gold imports is a major reason.
- Rivers in UP have beeb polluted to dangerous level because of the industrial waste released illegally into them by the industries.
All the industries located on the bank of the river should be closed down
II.Industrial waste should not be allowed to flow into the river
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
The gov should order the industries to avoid the flow of wastages into the river.
- The Modi Government is likely to overhaul its overseas investment regime as the government is keen to make it easier for doing business in the country and attract capital from abroad in the manufacturing unit.
Indian economy will compete with that of the developed nations
II.India’s ranking in ease of doing business will improve
Answer & Explanation
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
The decision will give an opportunity to global companies to enter the country easily.
In each question below is given a statement followed by two courses of action numbered 1 & 2. On the basis of information given in the statement to be true, then decide which of the following suggested courses of action logically follow(s) for pursuing. Give your answer as-
1)If only 1 follows
2)If only 2 follows
3)If either 1 or 2 follows
4)If neither 1 nor 2 follows
5)If both 1 & 2 follow
- The state government has decided to provide relief by way of food and clothes to all the flood victims in the state.
The government machinery should identify those people who are affected by flood and are to be provided with relief material.
II.The government machinery should procure enough food and clothes for providing relief to the flood victims.
Answer
Answer – 5)If both 1 & 2 follow
Explanation :
Both are right as government should provide relief material and food for the victims
- Increasing construction of residential towers in the city is hampering the infrastructure arrangements like water supply, sewage system etc.
Municipal authorities in the city should not permit construction of towers unless adequate provisions for infrastructural facilities are made.
II.Concerned authorities should take stringent action against those builders who are violating the rules.
Answer
Answer – 5)If both 1 & 2 follow
Explanation :
As the Infrastructure facilities are hampered the municipal authority should prohibit the establishment of towers until there are proper provisions are made. Moreover there must be strict actions against those who violates the rules.
- Drinking and rave parties have become fashion among the present college youth which diverts them from studies.
The state government should make it a rule to disallow the students from entering Pubs and Bars.
II.The parents as well as the colleges should impose strict discipline among the college going youth.
Answer
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
Government can’t ban students from going into pubs or bars but parents should be strict with their children and impose discipline
- Increasing competition on various fronts is putting children and youth under tremendous pressure leading them to take extremely drastic steps.
Parents and teachers should be advised not to bring pressure on children.
II.Children and youth along with their parents should be counselled for facing the competition in right spirit.
Answer
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation:
The pressure should be held in a healthy way with right spirit and timely counselling of parents
- The management of school ‘X’ has decided to give free breakfast from next academic year to all the students in the primary section through its canteen even though they will not get any government grant.
The canteen facilities and utensils will have to be checked and new purchases to be made to equip it properly.
II.The school will have to admit many poor students who will seek admission for the next academic year.
Answer
Answer – 1)If only 1 follows
Explanation :
Since the school has introduced the scheme without receiving any grant, it needs to pool up the funds and make adequate arrangements to keep the scheme going. Action 2 has no connection with the statement
- The Deputy Mayor of city ‘w’ has proposed to install a plant of mineral water and to supply citizens mineral water bottles at Rs.6 per litre as against Rs.10 per litre being sold by local private companies.
The tap water scheme of city w will have to be stopped.
II.The local private companies of city w will have to close their operation.
Answer
Answer – 4)If neither 1 nor 2 follows
Explanation :
Water for general use would still be delivered through taps also W is providing water at cheaper rates so both doesn’t go with the statement.
- The chairman of the car company announced in the meeting that all trials of its first product the new car model ‘M’ are over and company plans to launch its car in the market after six months.
The network of dealers is to be finalised and all legal, financial and other matters in this connection will have to be finalised shortly.
II.The company will have to make plan for product other than car.
Answer
Answer – 1)If only 1 follows
Explanation :
Once the trials are over the availability of resources is necessary to make. 2 has no connection with the statement
- A heavy unseasonal downpour during the last two days has paralysed the normal life in the state in which five persons were killed but this has provided a huge relief to the problem of acute water crisis in the state.
The state government should immediately remove all the restrictions on use of potable water in all the major cities in the state.
II.The state government should send relief supplies to all the affected areas in the state.
Answer
Answer – 2)If only 2 follows
Explanation :
Unseasonal downpour paralysed the normal life in the state so the Course of action (1) does not address the problem properly and only Course of action (2) is suitable for pursuing.
- The police department has come under a cloud with recent revelations that at least two senior police officers are suspected to have been involved in the illegal sale of a large quantity of weapons from the state police armoury.
A thorough investigation should be ordered by the State Government to find out all those who are involved into the illegal sale of arms.
II.State police armoury should be kept under Central Government control.
Answer
Answer – 1)If only 1 follows
Explanation :
Keeping the State police armoury under the supervision of Central Government control is not right action. Whereas an investigation may help to reveal those involved into the illegal acts. Hence, only action I is right.
- Some strains of mosquito have become resistant to chloroquine, the widely used medicine for malaria patients.
Researchers should develop a new medicine for patients affected by such mosquitoes.
II.Selling of chloroquine should be stopped.
Answer
Answer – 1)If only 1 follows
Explanation :
Chloroquine can still be used to get rid of the non-resistant varieties, and new medicines developed for the resistant varieties. So only 1 follows
- Statement :Even though the number of sugar factories is increasing at a fast rate in India, We still continue to import it from other countries.
The demand for sugar may increase substantially in future.
II.Even the increased number of factories may not be able to demand of sugar in India.
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 1)if only argument I is strong
- Statement :The gov announced a heavy compensation package for all the victims of the terrorist attacks.
Such incidents of terror may not occur in near future
II.Compensation may mitigate the anger among the citizens against the government.
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 4)if neither I or II are strong
- Statement :Gambling through lotteries is banned by central gov in all the states with immediate effect.
The citizens may not gamble in any other way, if the lotteries are banned.
II.This may save innocent citizens from getting cheated of their earned money
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 2)if only argument II is strong
- Statement :Increasing competition on various fronts is putting children and youth under tremendous pressure leading them to take extremely drastic steps.
Children and youth along with their parents should be counselled for facing the competition in right spirit.
II.Parents and teachers should be advised not to bring pressure on children.
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 1)if only argument I is strong
- Statement :Should India change its course from the economic reform process and look inward for all round economic development ?
No, there is no way to look backward after having started the process
II.Yes, this will benefit India in long run as the reform process borrowed from western countries will adversely affect our economy.
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 4)if neither I or II are strong
- Statement :The US based FMCG company has developed a new deodorant. The company selected a media person couple for its promotion and marketing. They marketing it through TV, Radio and Social media.
People want to see film stars and famous sports personality in the advertisement of an FMCG product
II.Some people may tend to buy the deodorant of the US based FMCG company
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 2)if only argument II is strong
- Statement :Many sociologists have argued that there is a functional relationship between education and economic systems. They point to the fact that mass formal education began in industrial society and is an established part of all industrial societies.
Industrial society is responsible for expansion of education of the mass level.
II.Formal education has suffered a setback due to industrial society
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 1)if only argument I is strong
- Statement :The gov has appealed to all citizens to use potable water judiciously as there is an acute shortage in supply. Excessive use may lead to huge scarcity in future months.
Large number of people may positively respond to the gov’s appeal and help tide over the crisis.
II.Gov may be able to put in place alternate sources of water in the event of a crisis situation
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 1)if only argument I is strong
- Statement :The municipal corporation has announced 50% reduction in water supply till monsoon arrives in the city.
People may protest against the unilateral decision of the municipal corporation
II.Municipal corporation may reduce its taxes from the residents as it failed to provide adequate water
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 4)if neither I or II are strong
- Statement :In view of the severe heat wave passing through the state, the gov has asked all the schools to remain closed for the next fortnight with immediate effect?
The parents of the students may not allow their wards to attend school even after a fortnight.
II.The heat wave may not continue beyond a fortnight
1)if only argument I is strong
2)if only argument II is strong
3)if either I or II is strong
4)if neither I or II are strong
5)if both I and II follow
Answer
Answer – 2)if only argument II is strong
Each of the following questions consists of a statement followed by two arguments I and II.
Give answer:
(A) If only argument I is strong
(B) If only argument II is strong
(C) If either I or II is strong
(D) If neither I nor II is strong and
(E) If both I and II are strong.
1. Statement: Should the railways immediately stop issuing free passes to all its employees?
Arguments:
I. No. The employees have the right to travel free.
II. Yes. This will help railways to provide better facility.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
2. Statement : Should number of holidays of government employees be reduced ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Our government employees are having maximum number of holidays among the other countries of the world.
II. Yes. It will lead to increased productivity of government offices.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
3. Statement : Should there be reservation of seats and posts on communal basis ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. It will check most of the inter-communal biases.
II. No. Ours is a secular state.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
4. Statement : Should government stop spending huge amounts of money on international sports ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This money can be utilised for poor.
II. No. Sports-persons will be frustrated and will not get international exposure.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
5. Statement : Should education be made compulsory for all children up to the age of 14 ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will help to eradicate the system of forced employment of children.
II. Yes. This would increase the standard of living.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
6. Statement : Should the tuition fees in all post graduate courses be hiked considerably ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. This will bring some kind of seriousness among the students and will improve quality.
II. No. This will force the meritorious poor students to stay away from post-graduate courses.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
7. Statement: Should students union in universities be abolished ?
Arguments :
I. Yes. Students can pay full attention to their career development.
II. No. All the great leaders had been students union leaders.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
8. Statement: Should persons convicted of criminal offences in the past be allowed to contest elections in India?
Arguments:
I. No. Such persons cannot serve the cause of the people and country.
II. Yes. It is democracy – let people decide whom to vote.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
9. Statement: Should cutting of trees be banned altogether?
Arguments:
I. Yes. It is very much necessary to do so to restore ecological balance.
II. No. A total ban would harm timber based industries.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
10. Statement: Should the political parties be banned?
Arguments:
I. Yes. It is necessary to teach a lesson to the politicians.
II. No. It will lead to an end of democracy.
a. Only argument I is strong
b. Only argument II is strong
c. Either I or II is strong
d. Neither I nor II is strong
e. Both I and II are strong
Answer Key And Explanation:
- (D)
(Explanation:The free passes given to railway employees is a privilege for them, not their right. So, argument I does not hol Argument II seems to be vague.
2.(B)
3.(B)
4.(B)
(Explanation: Clearly spending money on sports can not be avoided merely for social economic problems. But Argument II is strong. Be a sports man and then think on this question. 🙂
5.(D)
6.(B)
(Explanation: Clearly seriousness among the students is not because of fees but second argument is strong.
7.(A)
8.(A)
(Explanation: Clearly, persons with criminal background cannot stand to serve as the representatives of the common people. So, they should not be allowed to contest elections. Thus, only argument I holds, while II does not
9.(E)
10.(D)(Explanation: Clearly, with the ban on political parties, candidates can independently contest elections. So, it will not end democracy. Thus, argument II does not hold. Argument I does not give a strong reason.
Directions (6-10): In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between ‘strong arguments and ‘weak’ arguments. ‘Strong’ arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. ‘Weak’ arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Instructions:
In each of the following a question is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which argument is strong and which argument is weak. Give answer
(1) if only argument I is strong.
(2) if only argument II is strong.
(3) if either argument I or II is strong.
(4) if neither argument I nor II is strong.
(5) if both the arguments I and II are strong.
- Statement:
Should the existing labour laws be changed in the favour of owners?
Arguments:
- Yes, the existing labour laws give much more protection to employees than required and thus production is reduced.
- No, because owners would exploit employees as before when there were no labour laws.
- Statement:
Should India acquire/manufacture the latest nuclear weapons?
Arguments:
- Yes, the enemies of India are improving their weapons continuously.
- No, it will be against our policy of maintaining world peace.
- Statement:
Should animals be killed in the name of laboratory experiment?
Argument:
- Yes, they are available in abundance.
- No, we have been supporting non-violence on every step of our lives.
- Statement:
Should the prestigious people be met with special treatment by law if they have committed crime unknowingly?
Arguments:
- Yes, because the prestigious people do not commit crime intentionally.
- No, it is our policy that everybody is equal before the law.
- Statement:
Should mutual funds be brought under stricter Government control?
Arguments:
- Yes, that is one of the ways to protect the interest of the investors.
- No, stricter Government controls are likely to be counterproductive.ANSWERS:
- 5
- 1
- 4
- 2
- 1
Directions (Q. 1-5): In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments insofar as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a “strong” argument and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer
(a) If only argument I is “strong”.
(b) If only argument II is “strong”.
(c) If either I or II is “strong”.
(d) If neither I nor II is “strong”.
(e) If both I and II are “strong”.
Q1. Statement: Should legal professionals of India have the right to go on strike?
Arguments:
- No, India is already facing a backlog of about three crore cases countrywide due to frequent strikes of lawyers. Another strike will only enhance the grievances of the aggrieved clients.
- Yes, legal professionals are also a part of our society. If they feel that their dignity, independence and integrity has been lowered, strike would be the only meaningful weapon for them.
Answer:(a)
I is strong because the backlog is a cause for concern. II is not strong because it is difficult to believe that strike is “the only meaningful weapon” to achieve the said objective.
Q2. Statement: Should there be a free phone service for children in distress?
Arguments:
- Yes, child is the father of man.
- No, this will be misused by children.
Answer:(d)
I is not strong because it is not directly related to our core issue. II is also not strong because this is based on a wrong notion.
Q3. Statement: Should citizens of India have the right to access information from the government?
Arguments:
- Yes, more than twenty countries have equipped their citizens with the right to access information from their respective governments.
- Yes, the move would provide openness in government functioning and ensure transparency and accountability in it.
Answer:(b)
I is not strong because we can’t correlate the facilities provided to the citizens of other countries with the facilities provided to Indian citizens. II is strong because this is will ensure smooth functioning of the government.
Q4. Statement: Should a rapist be sentenced to life imprisonment in India?
Arguments:
- Yes, there is an enormous increase in incidence of rape and crime against women all over India and the existing provisions for punishment are not so stringent that the cases of rapes can be reduced.
- Yes, punishment for rape should be more than that for murder as the rape victim suffers for her entire life.
Answer:(e)
I is strong because stringent punishment is a good course of action to put restriction on the number of cases of rapes. II is also strong on the ground of impact of the crime on the life of the victim.
Q5. Statement: Should proliferation of credit cards in the country be restricted?
Arguments:
- Yes, the facility provided through it makes a person spendthrift.
- No, the facility provided through it makes the cardholder high-tech.
Answer:(d)
Both the argument focus on trivial aspects. Hence, both I and II are weak arguments.
Directions (Q. 6-10): In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments insofar as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a “strong” argument and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer
(a) If only argument I is “strong”.
(b) If only argument II is “strong”.
(c) If either I or II is “strong”.
(d) If neither I nor II is “strong”.
(e) If both I and II are “strong”.
Q6. Statement: Should Antipiracy Bill be brought in the Parliament?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will help the film industry to fight against piracy as a result of which the industry will be financially strong.
- No, We have already provisions such as Copyright laws etc to fight against piracy.
Answer:(a)
Only I is strong. II is not strong because we do not know whether the existing provisions are sufficient or not.
Q7. Statement: Should Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) be entitled to dual citizenship?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will bolster the intimacy of the NRIs with the Indian soil.
- No, The move will not be fruitful for all NRIs because there is lack of provisions for dual citizenship in many countries.
Answer:(a)
I is not strong because intimacy of NRIs with Indian soil will be helpful for Indian economy. II is a weak argument because a move can’t be restricted only because the move is not giving benefit to all of a kind.
Q8. Statement: Should reputed private driver training schools be allowed to issue driving licences?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will enable more and more people to get driving licences.
- No, This will increase the congestion of the vehicles on the road and will result in traffic jams too.
Answer:(d)
I is weak because it is not desirable. Moreover, is falsely assumes that govt authorities can’t cope with the demand of driving hiences. II is weak because it is not logical. It wrongly assumes that such a move will lead to a spurt in the number of vehicles.
Q9. Statement: Should a trouble-born state like Jammu & Kashmir release separatist leaders without any condition?
Arguments:
- Yes, Release of separatist leaders will be useful as a goodwill gesture to make the situation peaceful in the state.
- No, Unconditional release of the separatist leaders will aggravate the existing situation because these leaders have not shown any flexibility in their views.
Answer:(c)
I is strong because it will encourage non-violence and will make the environment conducive for peace. II is also strong because effort from early one side will not necessarily usher in desirable result. But the state can’t be both more and less peaceful at the same time. Hence either I or II follows.
Q10. Statement: Should power theft be made a cognizable offence?
Arguments:
- Yes, People do not use power honestly.
- No, This will be a wise decision and will reduce anti-social activities in society.
Answer:(d)
Both I and II are weak arguments.
Directions (Q. 1-5): In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments insofar as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a “strong” argument and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer
(a) If only argument I is “strong”.
(b) If only argument II is “strong”.
(c) If either I or II is “strong”.
(d) If neither I nor II is “strong”.
(e) If both I and II are “strong”.
- Statement: Should legal professionals of India have the right to go on strike?
Arguments:
- No, India is already facing a backlog of about three crore cases countrywide due to frequent strikes of lawyers. Another strike will only enhance the grievances of the aggrieved clients.
- Yes, legal professionals are also a part of our society. If they feel that their dignity, independence and integrity has been lowered, strike would be the only meaningful weapon for them.Answer:
(a) I is strong because the backlog is a cause for concern. II is not strong because it is difficult to believe that strike is “the only meaningful weapon” to achieve the said objective. - Statement: Should there be a free phone service for children in distress?
Arguments:
- Yes, child is the father of man.
- No, this will be misused by children.Answer:
(d) I is not strong because it is not directly related to our core issue. II is also not strong because this is based on a wrong notion. - Statement:Should citizens of India have the right to access information from the government?
Arguments:
- Yes, more than twenty countries have equipped their citizens with the right to access information from their respective governments.
- Yes, the move would provide openness in government functioning and ensure transparency and accountability in it.Answer:
(b) I is not strong because we can’t correlate the facilities provided to the citizens of other countries with the facilities provided to Indian citizens. II is strong because this is will ensure smooth functioning of the government. - Statement:Should a rapist be sentenced to life imprisonment in India?
Arguments:
- Yes, there is an enormous increase in incidence of rape and crime against women all over India and the existing provisions for punishment are not so stringent that the cases of rapes can be reduced.
- Yes, punishment for rape should be more than that for murder as the rape victim suffers for her entire life.Answer:
(e) I is strong because stringent punishment is a good course of action to put restriction on the number of cases of rapes. II is also strong on the ground of impact of the crime on the life of the victim. - Statement: Should proliferation of credit cards in the country be restricted?
Arguments:
- Yes, the facility provided through it makes a person spendthrift.
- No, the facility provided through it makes the cardholder high-tech.Answer:
(d) Both the argument focus on trivial aspects. Hence, both I and II are weak arguments.
Directions (Q. 6-10): In making decisions about important questions, it is desirable to be able to distinguish between “strong” arguments and “weak” arguments insofar as they relate to the question. “Strong” arguments are those which are both important and directly related to the question. “Weak” arguments are those which are of minor importance and also may not be directly related to the question or may be related to a trivial aspect of the question.
Each question below is followed by two arguments numbered I and II. You have to decide which of the arguments is a “strong” argument and which is a “weak” argument. Give answer
(a) If only argument I is “strong”.
(b) If only argument II is “strong”.
(c) If either I or II is “strong”.
(d) If neither I nor II is “strong”.
(e) If both I and II are “strong”.
- Statement:Should Anti-piracy Bill be brought in the Parliament?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will help the film industry to fight against piracy as a result of which the industry will be financially strong.
- No, We have already provisions such as Copyright laws etc to fight against piracy.Answer:
(a) Only I is strong. II is not strong because we do not know whether the existing provisions are sufficient or not. - Statement: Should Non-Resident Indians (NRIs) be entitled to dual citizenship?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will bolster the intimacy of the NRIs with the Indian soil.
- No, The move will not be fruitful for all NRIs because there is lack of provisions for dual citizenship in many countries.Answer:
(a) I is not strong because intimacy of NRIs with Indian soil will be helpful for Indian economy. II is a weak argument because a move can’t be restricted only because the move is not giving benefit to all of a kind. - Statement:Should reputed private driver training schools be allowed to issue driving licences?
Arguments:
- Yes, This will enable more and more people to get driving licences.
- No, This will increase the congestion of the vehicles on the road and will result in traffic jams too.Answer:
(d) I is weak because it is not desirable. Moreover, is falsely assumes that govt authorities can’t cope with the demand of driving sciences. II is weak because it is not logical. It wrongly assumes that such a move will lead to a spurt in the number of vehicles. - Statement: Should a trouble-born state like Jammu & Kashmir release separatist leaders without any condition?
Arguments:
- Yes, Release of separatist leaders will be useful as a goodwill gesture to make the situation peaceful in the state.
- No, Unconditional release of the separatist leaders will aggravate the existing situation because these leaders have not shown any flexibility in their views.Answer:
(c) I is strong because it will encourage non-violence and will make the environment conducive for peace. II is also strong because effort from early one side will not necessarily usher in desirable result. But the state can’t be both more and less peaceful at the same time. Hence either I or II follows. - Statement: Should power theft be made a cognizable offence?
Arguments:
- Yes, People do not use power honestly.
- No, This will be a wise decision and will reduce anti-social activities in society.
Answer:
(d) Both I and II are weak arguments.
| Maths Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download | English Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download |
| GK/GS/GA Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download | Reasoning Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download |
| Banking Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download | DI Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download |
| All Subject Topicwise Short Tricks >Click Here To Download | Static GK & Awareness Topicwise Free PDF >Click Here To Download |
| Please Support us by Joining Below Groups & Like Our Pages we will be very thankful to you. | |
| Facebook Page : https://www.facebook.com/governmentadda/ | |
| Facebook Group : https://www.facebook.com/groups/governmentadda/ | |
| Telegram | Official Channel : https://telegram.me/GovtAdda |
| Current Affairs Channel : https://telegram.me/Ga_Buzz | |
| UPSC Channel : https://telegram.me/CivilServicesAdda | |
| SSC Channel : https://telegram.me/SscAdda | |
| Banking Channel : https://telegram.me/IbpsZone | |
| RBI Group : https://telegram.me/RbiZone | |
| Railway RRB Channel : https://telegram.me/RailwayZone | |
| IT Officer Group : https://telegram.me/IT_Officer | |
| Insurance Group : https://telegram.me/InsuranceZone | |
| Job Alert Channel : https://telegram.me/JobAlert | |
| https://twitter.com/GovtAdda | |
| https://www.instagram.com/governmentadda/ | |
| https://www.pinterest.com/governmentadda/ | |
| Youtube | Click Here To Subscribe Now |
Thanks,
Team GovernmentAdda
Share & Support Us
